nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 853:
Line 853: + + +
Talk:Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed (view source)
Revision as of 15:22, August 22, 2008
, 15:22, August 22, 2008→About the viewer reception
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:38, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 22:38, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
::The key is to report what people thought when they saw the movie. The distribution curve of the 2 to 9 figures shows a film that was well thought of, although not top of the line. The idea that we have to remove people because they may have enjoyed it for ideological reasons instead of movie making quality is inconsequential. If someone enjoys the film then they enjoy the film -- the reason is unimportant. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:22, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
::Dinsdale makes a strong point. Given that everyone seems to be in agreement that the IMDB ratings are neither reliable nor honest, why cite them at all? Better, I think, to link to some actual reviews (one would hope that a reviewer has at least viewed the film.) --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:43, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
::Dinsdale makes a strong point. Given that everyone seems to be in agreement that the IMDB ratings are neither reliable nor honest, why cite them at all? Better, I think, to link to some actual reviews (one would hope that a reviewer has at least viewed the film.) --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 22:43, 21 August 2008 (EDT)
:::They are only dishonest when someone games the system as has been done in this case. As far as reviewers being honest, did you even read what was written below? [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:22, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
== Expelled now on Amazon. PZ gets his fans to flood item with phony 1-star reviews. ==
== Expelled now on Amazon. PZ gets his fans to flood item with phony 1-star reviews. ==