nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
11,789
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 370:
Line 370: + +
Talk:The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (view source)
Revision as of 16:41, August 23, 2008
, 16:41, August 23, 2008→The removed link: reply
I'm sure that someone will ask why I removed the link about "Why Protestants agree with Mormons", so I'll quickly explain. The link in question did a very poor job of relating the two theologies, and quite frankly, misrepresented and misunderstood Christian doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation of Christ. It's one thing for Mormons to try to show the parallels between themselves and Christians, but we shouldn't misrepresent one another. I do not agree with LDS teachings, but I certainly would not wish to present incorrect info about them. So I simply do not wish for the Christian side to be misunderstood with that link in question. [[User:JimmyP|JimmyP]] 23:59, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
I'm sure that someone will ask why I removed the link about "Why Protestants agree with Mormons", so I'll quickly explain. The link in question did a very poor job of relating the two theologies, and quite frankly, misrepresented and misunderstood Christian doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation of Christ. It's one thing for Mormons to try to show the parallels between themselves and Christians, but we shouldn't misrepresent one another. I do not agree with LDS teachings, but I certainly would not wish to present incorrect info about them. So I simply do not wish for the Christian side to be misunderstood with that link in question. [[User:JimmyP|JimmyP]] 23:59, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
:You say the link "misrepresented and misunderstood Christian doctrines of the Trinity and the Incarnation of Christ" but you don't say how it does that. Please explain. --[[User:DeanS|DeanS<sup>talk</sup>]] 12:41, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
: Please use the talk page and wait for the reply before removing an important information. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:21, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
: Please use the talk page and wait for the reply before removing an important information. --[[User:Joaquín Martínez]], [[User talk:Joaquín Martínez|talk]] 08:21, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
What? No one has objected. I would be more than happy to talk with anyone about it, but no one has said anything. What's wrong with making a change then letting discussion take place if it is necessary? There may be no need for discussion on this, so I see no reason to sit back and wait. [[User:JimmyP|JimmyP]] 12:25, 23 August 2008 (EDT)
What? No one has objected. I would be more than happy to talk with anyone about it, but no one has said anything. What's wrong with making a change then letting discussion take place if it is necessary? There may be no need for discussion on this, so I see no reason to sit back and wait. [[User:JimmyP|JimmyP]] 12:25, 23 August 2008 (EDT)