3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 58:
Line 58: − +
Debate:Can conservapedia become the next Wikipedia, is this good or bad (view source)
Revision as of 21:47, August 23, 2008
, 21:47, August 23, 2008Undo revision 504019 by Smiley22432 (Talk)
:I think it would be difficult, because, wikipedia is already so big, and conservapedia is not really that well known.[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 12:33, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
:I think it would be difficult, because, wikipedia is already so big, and conservapedia is not really that well known.[[User:Red4tribe|Red4tribe]] 12:33, 22 August 2008 (EDT)
I would have to think conservapedia is somewhat liberal. No one can even put Michael Savage on the Conservative links page under radio. How ridiculous can you be? Savage is more conservative than Rush and Hannity combined...also George W. Bush is more liberal than conservative and this site praises him as a conservative. He's done more to destroy this country than Bill Clinton. - smiley22432
I would have to think conservapedia is somewhat liberal. No one can even put Michael Savage on the Conservative links page under radio. How ridiculous can you be? Savage is more conservative than Rush and Hannity combined.