86
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 26:
Line 26: + +
Talk:Ronald Wilson Reagan (view source)
Revision as of 04:40, March 20, 2007
, 04:40, March 20, 2007→Why do you dislike my references?
:::::Well, when I say I have cites, I don't mean it in the common Wikipedia sense of WP:V that any lie anybody told somewhere so long as it got in print is a valid citation. Not at all. I'm refering to a credible witness who has been properly vetted to stand up against cross examination. And I wouldn't make the reference if it were not so. Junk science, for example, does not qualify as a cite. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
:::::Well, when I say I have cites, I don't mean it in the common Wikipedia sense of WP:V that any lie anybody told somewhere so long as it got in print is a valid citation. Not at all. I'm refering to a credible witness who has been properly vetted to stand up against cross examination. And I wouldn't make the reference if it were not so. Junk science, for example, does not qualify as a cite. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 00:26, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
::::::Neither do passing observations. And people who are directly involved in an event will sometimes hold the most biased explanation for how that event happened. (By the way how does someone virtually admit as much?) Especially when you are talking about huge sociopolitical changes. Behavior is complicated, especially political behavior and, like I said before, monocausal explanations are generally weak.--[[User:Jack|Jack]] 00:40, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
I think you are all too exciteable. This is the '''Conservative''' pedia, not Wikipedia. Go peddle your liberal, and liberal-sourced material elsewhere. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)
I think you are all too exciteable. This is the '''Conservative''' pedia, not Wikipedia. Go peddle your liberal, and liberal-sourced material elsewhere. --[[User:TK|TK]] 21:04, 13 March 2007 (EDT)