Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,794
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 126:
Line 126: + +
→Not How the Term is Used: reply
::: "It is commonly viewed as [[pejorative]] term, which expresses objection to using someone's quotes against him in an allegedly deceitful and misleading manner." this is far mroe objective and accurate if you insist upon its inclusion in the article. I must also voice my objection to your revision of this article; no consensus was at any point reached, in fact I disagreed with you /before/ you went ahead and revised the article, yet you went ahead anyway. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 09:57, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
::: "It is commonly viewed as [[pejorative]] term, which expresses objection to using someone's quotes against him in an allegedly deceitful and misleading manner." this is far mroe objective and accurate if you insist upon its inclusion in the article. I must also voice my objection to your revision of this article; no consensus was at any point reached, in fact I disagreed with you /before/ you went ahead and revised the article, yet you went ahead anyway. [[User:Jirby|Jirby]] 09:57, 25 August 2008 (EDT)
:::: No, the allegation of "deceitful and misleading" is not central to the use of the term. Evolutionists use the term to object to any use of a quote against an evolutionist, even when there is no doubt that the quote is accurate and that the speaker intended to say it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:59, 25 August 2008 (EDT)