nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 15:
Line 15: + + + +
Talk:Misquoting Jesus: The Story Behind Who Changed the Bible and Why (view source)
Revision as of 15:47, August 29, 2008
, 15:47, August 29, 2008→"I am removing..."
=="I am removing..."==
=="I am removing..."==
"I am removing the fact citations for now until I can apply sources;" - isn't the idea to remove it ''after'' you have sources? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:00, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
"I am removing the fact citations for now until I can apply sources;" - isn't the idea to remove it ''after'' you have sources? [[User:Wandering|Wandering]] 22:00, 28 August 2008 (EDT)
:Point taken, but I also wanted to see if sources were needed at all. In looking at it, I don't believe so. The first fact citation on the accuracy of the King James Bible can be seen by anyone who has read different Bible versions. The differences are basically noted above in talking about Ehrman's 'findings' and in the NIV Study Bible, where they had been found and dealt with 20 years earlier -- and while there are a number of small differences and two disputed sections based upon the finding of more and earlier manuscripts in the last 300+ years, the changes compared to the volume of the overall work is small indeed.
:The other fact citation is covered under the reference to the writings of McDowell. That paragraph was from his work. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 11:47, 29 August 2008 (EDT)