3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: − Gentlemen at the other side are discussing the creation of a real, serious conservative encyclopedia, not one... like this. − Here is a typical response: ''"I second that motion. I can imagine a decent conservative encyclopedia, but Conservapedia aint it. The main reason I read Conservapedia is to understand how conservatives think, but I doubt Andy's personal blog is representative of broader conservativism. Agreed, we can build a better one."'' − − The discussion is going on on their WIGO page. Feel free to contribute. Ideally, Conservapedia should fill that role, but it has taken a not very conservative direction, unfortunately.
garbage