Siteadmin, Check users, nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
30,650
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 66:
Line 66: + + + + + +
an idea for LT
We only need terms like heterosexuality when discussing aberrations like [[homosexuality]]. When it comes to animals, there's only one way of reproducing, so the term never comes up; it's just called [[sexual reproduction]].
We only need terms like heterosexuality when discussing aberrations like [[homosexuality]]. When it comes to animals, there's only one way of reproducing, so the term never comes up; it's just called [[sexual reproduction]].
==Biblical teachings==
LT, you [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Heterosexuality&diff=next&oldid=494985 removed some quotes] which were obviously being used '''against''' Conservative morality, but can we not find a way to place these quotes in their proper context?
At Wikipedia, I once worked with some writers on Old Testament rules on marriage and so forth. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 11:19, 30 August 2008 (EDT)