Automoderated users, edit
1,837
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 166:
Line 166: − +
→"Soreness" Admission: I'm not sure I understand - could you elaborate your concerns?
The statement by the CDC that the injection commonly causes soreness at the injection site is meaningless, and almost comical. Unless there is a good reason for including such an obviously meaningless statement, let's remove it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:38, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
The statement by the CDC that the injection commonly causes soreness at the injection site is meaningless, and almost comical. Unless there is a good reason for including such an obviously meaningless statement, let's remove it.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 09:38, 29 August 2008 (EDT)
: I felt that the CDC statement validated and quantified the anecdotal evidence from the news story - it showed that it was not just a few silly high school girls saying "ooohhhh, that hurt!" to a newspaper reporter, but rather that it was a widespread and well-documented reaction to the vaccine. I'm not sure I understand your objection? At first I thought you thought the whole paragraph was not worthy of inclusion (which I could see both sides of), but since you've just removed the CDC part, I realize I don't understand your objection. How is it meaningless? Please understand - I'm not criticizing your opinion - just trying to understand it. I can be a bit ditsy at times - blonde, actually! - so sometimes I don't get the obvious unless it's spelled out to me. --[[User:Hsmom|Hsmom]] 22:19, 30 August 2008 (EDT)
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>