Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 28: Line 28:  
:There are 10 kinds: those who understand binary, and those who don't. ;)  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:36, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:There are 10 kinds: those who understand binary, and those who don't. ;)  --[[User:Benp|Benp]] 19:36, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 
What about teaching '''trust''' as a positive value, rather than encouraging a negative attitude of expecting deceit? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 19:57, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 
What about teaching '''trust''' as a positive value, rather than encouraging a negative attitude of expecting deceit? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 19:57, 31 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
 +
== The Liberal Notion that Authority is necessarily Wrong ==
 +
Well the liberals are correct on this one.  Some things are better than others, while still being less than perfect.  As there is only one truth this truth would be perfect.  A claim to not being wrong is a claim to perfection.  I think we can all agree that any earthly authority is necessarily less than perfect.  Thus it is necessarily not true, thus it is necessarily wrong.  It might be spectacularly good, it might be very valuable but there is still room for improvement. 
 +
That improvement in an authority can only arise through criticism (which may be sefl-criticism) of the authority.  Many authorities have not just avoided being good but have been positively bad.  It is essential that children are taught to question and not blindly obey "authority", lest they obey bad instructions of authority later in life.  If we do not teach children to question we run the risk of happy, drug free, intelligent people pushing other people into gas chambers because they were always taught at school to do what they were told without question. --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 08:09, 1 September 2008 (EDT)
241

edits

Navigation menu