Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
587 bytes removed ,  06:57, June 27, 2016
clean up & uniformity
Line 3: Line 3:  
:Congress shall make no law ... abridging the '''freedom of speech''' ....
 
:Congress shall make no law ... abridging the '''freedom of speech''' ....
   −
The purpose of the free speech was to limit the power of the [[federal government]].  For [[James Madison]], "the First Amendment is not about self-expression, the search for truth as an end in itself, or even the opportunity for political participation as a means of self-fulfillment — it is about checking abuses of power."; he did not even cite the First Amendment in criticizing the [[Sedition Act]].<ref>http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2004_spr/blasi.htm</ref>
+
The purpose of the free speech was to limit the power of the [[federal government]].  For [[James Madison]], "the First Amendment is not about self-expression, the search for truth as an end in itself, or even the opportunity for political participation as a means of self-fulfillment — it is about checking abuses of power." The First Amendment was only mentioned in passing in his objections to the [[Sedition Act of 1798]].<ref>http://www.law.virginia.edu/html/news/2004_spr/blasi.htm</ref>
   −
After the [[Civil War]] and the passage of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]], the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] expanded the [[First Amendment]] to apply against all forms of government, such as [[state]] and [[local government]]s.   
+
After the [[Civil War]] and the passage of the [[Fourteenth Amendment]], the [[U.S. Supreme Court]] expanded the [[First Amendment]] to apply against all forms of government, such as state and local governments.   
    
== What Free Speech Is ==
 
== What Free Speech Is ==
 
Free speech is the doctrine that allows a citizen to speak freely without government restriction.
 
Free speech is the doctrine that allows a citizen to speak freely without government restriction.
<div class="plainlinks" style="margin-right:5px;width:140px;float:left;border-bottom: solid 1px #aaa;border-top: solid 1px #aaa;border-right: solid 1px #aaa;">
+
 
<p style="font-size: 150%;font-style:bold">Ads by [http://www.google.com/ <span style="font-family:batang;font-size:150%"><font color="blue">G</font><font color="red">o</font><font color="#dddd00">o</font><font color="blue">g</font><font color="green">l</font><font color="red">e</font></span>]</p>
  −
[http://www.ration<!-- -->alwiki.com <u>Come join the Irrational ones</u>]
  −
<br>
  −
Get all the latest news on Conservapedia. Membership free all this week. Sysopships available daily.
  −
<br>
  −
[http://www.ration<!-- -->alwiki.com www.ration<!-- -->alwiki.com]
  −
</div>
   
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote in ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357
 
Supreme Court Justice Louis D. Brandeis wrote in ''Whitney v. California'', 274 U.S. 357
 
(1927):
 
(1927):
*[The Founding Fathers] believed that freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth; that without free speech and assembly discussion would be futile; that with them, discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against noxious doctrine; that the greatest menace to freedom is an inert people; that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government. <ref> [http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/hecklers-veto-05.pdf Hecklers-veto] </ref>
+
*[The Founding Fathers] believed that freedom to think as you will and to speak as you think are means indispensable to the discovery and spread of political truth; that without free speech and assembly discussion would be futile; that with them, discussion affords ordinarily adequate protection against noxious doctrine; that the greatest menace to freedom is an inert people; that public discussion is a political duty; and that this should be a fundamental principle of the American government.<ref>[http://www.cwfa.org/images/content/hecklers-veto-05.pdf Hecklers-veto]</ref>
    
== What Free Speech is Not ==
 
== What Free Speech is Not ==
Line 28: Line 21:  
Heckling is a gray area in the ethics of free speech. To a certain extent, interrupting a public speech with question or retorts is tolerated. On the other hand, using heckling as a tactic to stop the speaker is not an expression of free speech (on the heckler's part) as much as it is a violation of the speaker's free speech rights.
 
Heckling is a gray area in the ethics of free speech. To a certain extent, interrupting a public speech with question or retorts is tolerated. On the other hand, using heckling as a tactic to stop the speaker is not an expression of free speech (on the heckler's part) as much as it is a violation of the speaker's free speech rights.
   −
Also, according to conservative judge William Rehnquist, free speech is not the ability to burn the American flag.
+
Also, according to conservative judge William Rehnquist, free speech does not include the right to burn the American flag.
    
== Origins ==
 
== Origins ==
Line 40: Line 33:     
*[[Free enterprise]]
 
*[[Free enterprise]]
 +
*[[United States Constitution]]
    
==External links==
 
==External links==
Line 50: Line 44:       −
[[category:politics]]
+
[[Category:United States Constitution]]
 +
[[Category:Religion and Politics]]
 +
[[Category:First Amendment]]
Block, SkipCaptcha, Automoderated users, Bots, edit
57,719

edits

Navigation menu