156
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 9:
Line 9: − +
Debate:Is Sarah Palin an asset or a liability to John McCain's candidacy? (view source)
Revision as of 20:07, September 2, 2008
, 20:07, September 2, 2008→Palin is an Asset
This is obviously a transparent attempt to get the women's vote, but that doesn't mean it won't work. And she has some good experience too - both in business, and as govener of a city. That's a definate plus. Unfortunatly I've had to make some criticisms in another comment, as she is far from perfect. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 15:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
This is obviously a transparent attempt to get the women's vote, but that doesn't mean it won't work. And she has some good experience too - both in business, and as govener of a city. That's a definate plus. Unfortunatly I've had to make some criticisms in another comment, as she is far from perfect. [[User:NewCrusader|NewCrusader]] 15:00, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
:She absolutely is an asset. The Democrats have hoped for a (their) woman President since Lisa Simpson and Hillary Clinton, how embarassed would it be for them if a Republican is the first woman President? (4 years from now, obviously I'm not wishing for a premature departure by President McCain!). [[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 16:07, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
==Palin is a Liability==
==Palin is a Liability==