156
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: +
Debate:Is Sarah Palin an asset or a liability to John McCain's candidacy? (view source)
Revision as of 20:43, September 2, 2008
, 20:43, September 2, 2008→Palin is an Asset
:She absolutely is an asset. The Democrats have hoped for a (their) woman President since Lisa Simpson and Hillary Clinton, how embarassed would it be for them if a Republican is the first woman President? (4 years from now, obviously I'm not wishing for a premature departure by President McCain!). [[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 16:07, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
:She absolutely is an asset. The Democrats have hoped for a (their) woman President since Lisa Simpson and Hillary Clinton, how embarassed would it be for them if a Republican is the first woman President? (4 years from now, obviously I'm not wishing for a premature departure by President McCain!). [[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 16:07, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
::So the Democrats have wanted a woman to be President since Hillary Clinton, and Palin could be the first woman president and the Democrats would be embarrassed. Besides all of that being debatable on its own, you have yet to explain how it's an asset for the GOP. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 16:12, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
::So the Democrats have wanted a woman to be President since Hillary Clinton, and Palin could be the first woman president and the Democrats would be embarrassed. Besides all of that being debatable on its own, you have yet to explain how it's an asset for the GOP. --[[User:Jareddr|Jareddr]] 16:12, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
:::Because American voters see the opportunity I mentioned, and will turn in mass to vote for her (and McCain in the process). [[User:SilvioB|SilvioB]] 16:43, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
==Palin is a Liability==
==Palin is a Liability==