45
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 30:
Line 30: + +
Talk:Emotional gambling (view source)
Revision as of 17:05, September 3, 2008
, 17:05, September 3, 2008significance?
:: I think people could still engage in [[emotional gambling]] with respect to a presidential election by exaggerating the significance of the outcome. But I agree with you that our entry needs to express the real point better, and not rely so much on political examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:55, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:: I think people could still engage in [[emotional gambling]] with respect to a presidential election by exaggerating the significance of the outcome. But I agree with you that our entry needs to express the real point better, and not rely so much on political examples.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:55, 3 September 2008 (EDT)
:::With respect sir, the outcome of the US Presidential election is certainly not without its significance in the UK and many of us have great emotional currency invested in it! Should your Republicans win again it will certainly improve matters here in the UK and, hopefully, hasten the end of the socialists we currently have in office! The "gamble" here will be whether or not the so called 'conservative' party can, or will, stop its swing to the political left and revitalise the country, puttinhg it back on it's Christian path.