4,336
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Conservapedia talk:Commonly misspelled words (view source)
Revision as of 12:57, September 4, 2008
, 12:57, September 4, 2008New page: ==Alright== Jinxmchue is right, 'alright' is not technically wrong (although it is one of those words that gives us English teachers nightmares). However, it is generally considered to be ...
==Alright==
Jinxmchue is right, 'alright' is not technically wrong (although it is one of those words that gives us English teachers nightmares). However, it is generally considered to be inappropriate for formal writing [http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/023.html], along with 'a lot', 'nice' and 'got'. I will leave out of the list for now, but I would be happier to see it restored, as we should be using formal writing styles here. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Hajimemashite!'']]</sup> 08:57, 4 September 2008 (EDT)
Jinxmchue is right, 'alright' is not technically wrong (although it is one of those words that gives us English teachers nightmares). However, it is generally considered to be inappropriate for formal writing [http://www.bartleby.com/64/C003/023.html], along with 'a lot', 'nice' and 'got'. I will leave out of the list for now, but I would be happier to see it restored, as we should be using formal writing styles here. --[[User:JessicaT|KotomiT]]<sup>[[User talk:JessicaT|''Hajimemashite!'']]</sup> 08:57, 4 September 2008 (EDT)