1
edit
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 85:
Line 85: + + + + + +
Talk:Roman Catholicism (view source)
Revision as of 16:35, September 4, 2008
, 16:35, September 4, 2008no edit summary
I think that this is a prime canidate to be a debate page, and though I`m not clear on how to make a debate page, maybe someone could for me
I think that this is a prime canidate to be a debate page, and though I`m not clear on how to make a debate page, maybe someone could for me
Just a thought but this article implies that the catholic church is the church that followed on from the ministry of Jesus. This isn't the case. The early Catholic church (it is alleged)known by scholars as the Pauline church (as it subscribed to the teachings of Paul of Tarsus,) engaged in a power struggle with what was at the time the established "Jerusalem Church" led by Jesus' brother James the Just. After the killing of James by a follower of the Pauline tradition (by throwing him off the corner of the temple mount and finishing him off with a fullers mallet)the Jerusalem church fled into the diaspora and the catholic church has done its best to suppress its existance ever since.
Would this be a worthwile edition?
The article is fairly scanty on the catholics role in evangalism accross the globe and its repository of history and knowledge particularly after the collapse of the Roman Empire. I realise that website is conservative in nature and the rift between The episcapalian ministry and The catholic church run's pretty deep in america and conservapedia tends to see people or groups with either a white hat or a black one, but surely Catholocism's influence on art, histiography and western culture in generalneeds to be acknowledged.
[[Trident1222]]