Changes

:That last comment is either supposed to be ironic, or from a very uninformed fundamentalist. I can't tell which.--[[User:Sm355|Sm355]] 20:14, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

:That last comment is either supposed to be ironic, or from a very uninformed fundamentalist. I can't tell which.--[[User:Sm355|Sm355]] 20:14, 19 March 2007 (EDT)

The hypocrisy on this issue is overwhelming on both sides (Left and Right).  Al Gore wants everyone to reduce their carbon footprint while his home uses order(s) of magnitude electricity than an average home - Why? '''BECAUSE I CAN AFFORD IT AND BUY CARBON ALLOWANCES''' (or some such rant).  The right believes that they can do anything in their own backyard, as long as they can make money, while lecturing to everyone else as to how they may be polluting God's earth (or some such rant) (it gets worse).  There have been changes in the average temperature - to conclude that ALL of this can be attributed to human activity is not clear.  To ignore that what we may be seeing is a 1500 (?) year cycle is irresponsible.  Weather models are complex and have many parameters that are difficult to estimate or calculate and so one can get any predictions one wants by tinkering.  The left wants economic progress such that only the really rich can afford it, the right wants it for themselves but would like to deny the developing countries from developing (e.g. restricting the use of freon ("destroying the ozone layer") and discouraging the increased use of oil/gas (since the prices go up for everyone).  So, is there really such a thing as Global warming?  Perhaps.  But after listening to Michael Crichton on CSPAN (?) about how even good journals can be biased in what they publish, I have NO idea what or who to believe.  Too much noise, too much politics.  OK, IF Al Gore leaves his HUGE mansion and moves to the middle of the desert and forsakes ALL modern conveniences including his car, electricity and whatever the heck he wears on his face and hair and such, and lives like a hermit, I will believe in Global Warming, what say you Mr. Gore?

The hypocrisy on this issue is overwhelming on both sides (Left and Right).  Al Gore wants everyone to reduce their carbon footprint while his home uses order(s) of magnitude electricity than an average home - Why? '''BECAUSE I CAN AFFORD IT AND BUY CARBON ALLOWANCES''' (or some such rant).  The right believes that they can do anything in their own backyard, as long as they can make money, while lecturing to everyone else as to how they may be polluting God's earth (or some such rant) (it gets worse).  There have been changes in the average temperature - to conclude that ALL of this can be attributed to human activity is not clear.  To ignore that what we may be seeing is a 1500 (?) year cycle is irresponsible.  Weather models are complex and have many parameters that are difficult to estimate or calculate and so one can get any predictions one wants by tinkering.  The left wants economic progress such that only the really rich can afford it, the right wants it for themselves but would like to deny the developing countries from developing (e.g. restricting the use of freon ("destroying the ozone layer") and discouraging the increased use of oil/gas (since the prices go up for everyone).  So, is there really such a thing as Global warming?  Perhaps.  But after listening to Michael Crichton on CSPAN (?) about how even good journals can be biased in what they publish, I have NO idea what or who to believe.  Too much noise, too much politics.  OK, IF Al Gore leaves his HUGE mansion and moves to the middle of the desert and forsakes ALL modern conveniences including his car, electricity and whatever the heck he wears on his face and hair and such, and lives like a hermit, I will believe in Global Warming, what say you Mr. Gore? [[User:kchittur|kchittur]]