150
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: + + +
→Do we really want to "invite" school-age students to this site?
::What's ridiculous is that certain wikis are forbidden to be mentioned or linked to from CP because they express non-conservative views while claiming to be rational, and you don't see articles about them with screen captures to show why it's inappropriate. Yet somehow, it's okay to devote an article full of euphemisms and screen captures with the URL to a hate-speech wiki that disguises itself as "alternative". I wonder just who from "the administration" is willing is willing to put their names on the record as being for the not-so-subtle promotion of this site on CP. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:59, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
::What's ridiculous is that certain wikis are forbidden to be mentioned or linked to from CP because they express non-conservative views while claiming to be rational, and you don't see articles about them with screen captures to show why it's inappropriate. Yet somehow, it's okay to devote an article full of euphemisms and screen captures with the URL to a hate-speech wiki that disguises itself as "alternative". I wonder just who from "the administration" is willing is willing to put their names on the record as being for the not-so-subtle promotion of this site on CP. --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 15:59, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
:::I'm willing to Assume Good Faith for the moment, but when comparing this to some other extremely bold "We expose the truth!" articles (like the ones about Obama, Wikipedia, etc.), it ''does'' look "carefully worded".
:::The article does need work, even when you ignore these issues. I'll try to aid in the clean-up without being overly "controversial". --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 16:05, 6 September 2008 (EDT)