Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
622 bytes added ,  21:21, September 6, 2008
Line 11: Line 11:  
:::I'm willing to Assume Good Faith for the moment, but when comparing this to some other extremely bold "We expose the truth!" articles (like the ones about Obama, Wikipedia, etc.), it ''does'' look "carefully worded".
 
:::I'm willing to Assume Good Faith for the moment, but when comparing this to some other extremely bold "We expose the truth!" articles (like the ones about Obama, Wikipedia, etc.), it ''does'' look "carefully worded".
 
:::The article does need work, even when you ignore these issues. I'll try to aid in the clean-up without being overly "controversial". --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 16:05, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:::The article does need work, even when you ignore these issues. I'll try to aid in the clean-up without being overly "controversial". --[[User:DirkB|DirkB]] 16:05, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
::::I'm in two minds.  On the one hand it's an nasty, deceitful little site.  It tries to look reasoned and rational, slips in little insuations, then little half truths, then full blown Nazi lies.  On the other hand: looking at this site and reviewing just how it tries to go about it's foul purpose would be a very good exercise to innoculate students against some of the more insidious [[deceit]] that's put there.  Anyway I think the article should either be deleted (no great loss!) or it should "tell it how it is" (I've put something in to that effect) --[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 17:21, 6 September 2008 (EDT)
    
== Gallery disclaimer ==
 
== Gallery disclaimer ==
241

edits

Navigation menu