nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 21:
Line 21: − +
→...although it would still be considered [[incest]]: fix typo
So I see no reason for that phrase being in there.
So I see no reason for that phrase being in there.
I'm not happy about the reference to intercourse with Eve (besides, why not a daughter with Adam), as that would be adultery, but between married brother and sister it would have been okay at the time.
I'm not happy about the reference to intercourse with Eve (besides, why not a daughter with Adam?), as that would be adultery, but between married brother and sister it would have been okay at the time.
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
[[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:37, 20 March 2007 (EDT)