Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 146: Line 146:  
:As for using the "Professor Values" argument as a reason not to, do you really consider the majority of teachers, especially at the pre-college level, to be as morally bankrupt as you make professors out to be?  Slamming the values of all educators because of the actions of a miniscule sample of college-level professors is shameful.  Some of the greatest role models in my young life were my teachers, and they were represented across the parochial and public schools I had attended.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:33, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:As for using the "Professor Values" argument as a reason not to, do you really consider the majority of teachers, especially at the pre-college level, to be as morally bankrupt as you make professors out to be?  Slamming the values of all educators because of the actions of a miniscule sample of college-level professors is shameful.  Some of the greatest role models in my young life were my teachers, and they were represented across the parochial and public schools I had attended.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 13:33, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
    +
 +
::Dinsdale, [[Professor values]] are a very real part of the modern, [[Liberal]]-dominated state education systems in much of the western world, and to deny their influence is [[wilful ignorance]]. And describing the actions of the founder of Conservapedia as 'shameful' is in itself shameful, insulting and wrong. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 15:03, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
    
==A bit puzzled...==
 
==A bit puzzled...==
3,303

edits

Navigation menu