39
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 878:
Line 878: + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive2 (view source)
Revision as of 13:44, March 20, 2007
, 13:44, March 20, 2007→Six times? Not even close.
::: 2:1 is not "33%". It is 200%. 1:3 is not 75%. It is 33%. 200% divided by 33% is ... 6. Well, whatta ya know!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:40, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
::: 2:1 is not "33%". It is 200%. 1:3 is not 75%. It is 33%. 200% divided by 33% is ... 6. Well, whatta ya know!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:40, 16 March 2007 (EDT)
While that is true, Aschlafly, that is not how ratios work. 2:1 means 2 parts conservative, 1 part liberal for a total of 1/(1+2)= 33% liberal of the total population. 1:3 is 1 part conservative, 3 parts liberal for a total of 3/(1+3)= 75% liberal of the total population. The "Liberal math" was correct. you obviously don't understand how basic mathematics works. Sorry for being blunt, but if you're going to criticize someone's methods, at least know what your talking about.--[[User:Fpresjh|Fpresjh]] 09:44, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
::'Heaven can be defined in a similar manner! Ha ha ha.'
::'Heaven can be defined in a similar manner! Ha ha ha.'