17,394
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Alexander Hamilton (view source)
Revision as of 02:22, September 8, 2008
, 02:22, September 8, 2008added material
Some thoughts…..
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this. If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Not to quibble, but how does removing a "pro-tax bias" with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
== History has a liberal bias? ==
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page? Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.
==new text==
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)
Before anyone starts claiming that “taxes placing the United States on a sound financial footing is a liberal falsehood,” please note that I have provided references, and nearly any good college level U.S. history text will agree with this. If you want evidence from a primary source, please consult Hamilton’s Report on Public Credit, which can be found in the ''American State Papers, Finance, vol. one, 1789-1802'' which can be found here http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/amlaw/lwsplink.html
In keeping with conservapedia’s commandment # 1, everything in this article is “true and verifiable.” If you do think something in this article is incorrect, please have, as I do, the intellectual integrity to cite your sources. --[[User:1048247|1048247]] 12:49, 6 May 2007 (EDT)
Not to quibble, but how does removing a "pro-tax bias" with an anti-tax bias any better? [[User:Jrssr5|Jrssr5]] 10:08, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
== History has a liberal bias? ==
Who is this [http://www.conservapedia.com/User_talk:Aschlafly#Notice_of_likely_blocking guy] to tell us to get off his talk page? Will he block you if you put it back on, 104etc?-[[User:BillBuck|BillBuck]] 11:50, 3 May 2007 (EDT)
I am a little surprised by the reaction. Nearly any scholar will cite excise taxes as ONE of the reasons that the U.S. retired its war debt. It also caused agreat deal of resentment. That was what the Whiskey Rebellion was about.
==new text==
I'm adding a bibliography I compiled and new material-- all written by me but some appeared in Wikipedia or Citizendium.org [[User:RJJensen|RJJensen]] 22:22, 7 September 2008 (EDT)