Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 4:
Line 4: + +
reply
What was stupid about it? As for it being unreferenced, the reference at the end of that sentence has the bloke saying, "Fr Funes ... said ... that the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of scientific accuracy." If he says that it has a lack of scientific accuracy, he is saying that it is ''inaccurate'' (in areas that science says differently). That bit should be reinstated. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:22, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
What was stupid about it? As for it being unreferenced, the reference at the end of that sentence has the bloke saying, "Fr Funes ... said ... that the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of scientific accuracy." If he says that it has a lack of scientific accuracy, he is saying that it is ''inaccurate'' (in areas that science says differently). That bit should be reinstated. [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:22, 11 September 2008 (EDT)
:Sorry I took offense. He was not saying that he believed the bible was inaccurate, just in regards to science. You can reworded the phrase. The bible is inaccurate to explain science, It just sounded like the Rev doesn't believe in the bible, which he does. Bloke? Are you from down under? My apologies. --[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 17:35, 11 September 2008 (EDT)