Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 21:
Line 21: + +
/* Edit comment: 'removed stupid uncited ref "the Bible to be inaccurate" ' forced to reply again
:::::: When he says that the Bible has scientific inaccuracies, and he believes the science rather than the Bible, then he is clearly ''not'' basing his views on the Bible rather than science. And by the way, the question is not whether God ''can'' do anything. The question is what God ''did'', and what He ''said'' He did. That is, God ''could'' have made ETs. But this is contrary to what God said he ''did''.
:::::: When he says that the Bible has scientific inaccuracies, and he believes the science rather than the Bible, then he is clearly ''not'' basing his views on the Bible rather than science. And by the way, the question is not whether God ''can'' do anything. The question is what God ''did'', and what He ''said'' He did. That is, God ''could'' have made ETs. But this is contrary to what God said he ''did''.
:::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:32, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 02:32, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
::::::: You go ahead and defend atheist dork PZ Meyers, I will go ahead and defend my Catholic Pope and Fumes. Just remove the last word in his statement "...the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of science." There is nothing 'clearly' about your accusations. Rather your bias contradicts yourself. Lack of scientific accuracy and the Bible is inaccurate are separate from another. "How am I offending you and your religion?" It is NO big deal for you to call the Popes inner circle 'HERETICS'