nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 23:
Line 23: + + + + + + +
→Edit comment: 'removed stupid uncited ref "the Bible to be inaccurate" ': A good way to lose an argument
::::::: You go ahead and defend atheist dork PZ Meyers, I will go ahead and defend my Catholic Pope and Fumes. Just remove the last word in his statement "...the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of science." There is nothing 'clearly' about your accusations. Rather your bias contradicts yourself. Lack of scientific accuracy and the Bible is inaccurate are separate from another. "How am I offending you and your religion?" It is NO big deal for you to call the Popes inner circle 'HERETICS'-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 05:12, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
::::::: You go ahead and defend atheist dork PZ Meyers, I will go ahead and defend my Catholic Pope and Fumes. Just remove the last word in his statement "...the Bible should not be held to account for its lack of science." There is nothing 'clearly' about your accusations. Rather your bias contradicts yourself. Lack of scientific accuracy and the Bible is inaccurate are separate from another. "How am I offending you and your religion?" It is NO big deal for you to call the Popes inner circle 'HERETICS'-- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 05:12, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::::: I did not defend Myers, at least not with any intention to do so. I was defending the truth. I simply pointed out that that Myers did do something that Andy said he would not do. If you will note, I also said that he was "offensive, illogical, and close-minded". That's hardly an indication that I like the bloke (who, by the way, once called me a troll, despite this being in reference to a conversation in which one of my adversaries actually complimented me a few times).
:::::::: If you have to actually remove a word from a sentence to make your point, then you have clearly lost your argument.
:::::::: "''...your bias contradicts yourself''": Yet you demonstrate no bias nor contradiction.
:::::::: "''Lack of scientific accuracy and the Bible is inaccurate are separate from another.''": Yet you totally fail to demonstrate this. How are they separate?
:::::::: "''"How am I offending you and your religion?" It is NO big deal for you to call the Popes inner circle 'HERETICS'''": I merely pointed out that Fume fitted the definition that you provided. If the cap fits...
:::::::: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 09:40, 12 September 2008 (EDT)