4,781
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 5:
Line 5: +
User talk:Kaylee19892 (view source)
Revision as of 19:14, September 12, 2008
, 19:14, September 12, 2008→Foxtrot Warning: reply
Please refrain from slandering a prominent editor in such a sarcastic way. Leave this discussion to the senior members of the site. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:03, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
Please refrain from slandering a prominent editor in such a sarcastic way. Leave this discussion to the senior members of the site. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 00:03, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
:I assume you mean libelling not slandering. And if you really, honestly think I’m wrong, then I don’t think you’ll have long until you are forced into changing your mind. And please don't think I'm going to take a warning from you at all seriously - if pointing out the obvious is a blocking offense then... [[User:Kaylee19892|Kaylee19892]] 11:39, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
:I assume you mean libelling not slandering. And if you really, honestly think I’m wrong, then I don’t think you’ll have long until you are forced into changing your mind. And please don't think I'm going to take a warning from you at all seriously - if pointing out the obvious is a blocking offense then... [[User:Kaylee19892|Kaylee19892]] 11:39, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
::Yes, I mean libel not slander. I didn't know that slander is always spoken while libel is always written. Thank you for the correction. In making the initial point, I was not stating my opinion whether I think you are right or wrong. However, your comment was lodged within a discussion involving the higher-ups at this site and was a one-off comment against another editor with far higher standing than you. Regardless of whether you turn out to be right or wrong, that is not appropriate behavior. Leave this matter to the senior editors to decide. I look forward to your contributions. -[[User:Foxtrot|Foxtrot]] 15:14, 12 September 2008 (EDT)