Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎Past Nominations: hide comments (now that I've added this ability to the template)
Line 199: Line 199:  
==Past Nominations==
 
==Past Nominations==
 
The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring.
 
The following articles were proposed and determined not to be suitable for featuring. If the article has been improved to the point where it is of sufficient quality to be featured, move it back to Proposed for Featuring.
−
{{fa|Colorado Springs|
+
{{fa|Colorado Springs|hide=yes|
 
:*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:*Disagree. Too short. Too many red links. [[User:TonyT|TonyT]] 12:40, 16 June 2008 (EDT)
 
:*Disagree. Too short; a good start but needs more info; too many red links. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 21:21, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
 
:*Disagree. Too short; a good start but needs more info; too many red links. [[User:Taj|Taj]] 21:21, 14 July 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu