11
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 29:
Line 29: + + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 16:53, September 13, 2008
, 16:53, September 13, 2008no edit summary
: PNAS procedures required me to submit the letter electronically using its own electronic submission software. When the PNAS acknowledged that my submission complied with all its requirements, it also said that the authors of the original paper had been notified of my letter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:39, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
: PNAS procedures required me to submit the letter electronically using its own electronic submission software. When the PNAS acknowledged that my submission complied with all its requirements, it also said that the authors of the original paper had been notified of my letter.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 12:39, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Too bad. It doesn't make much sense though, guess that tells a lot about PNAS. What they should care about is the actual text, not the medium it is in. That's not the case IMHO for encyclopedias however. If not for anything else, a scan would have been useful as a reference for the digital text. Oh well... [[User:Raul|Raul]] 12:53, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
== Please ==
== Please ==
Please, stop deleting entries in this talk page. It puts conservatives in bad light. Let's answer with reason and debating skills instead. This is particularly aimed at user:Aschlafly.
Please, stop deleting entries in this talk page. It puts conservatives in bad light. Let's answer with reason and debating skills instead. This is particularly aimed at user:Aschlafly.