Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,230 bytes added ,  20:48, September 13, 2008
Wikipedia isn't perfect, but this site proves that it could be a lot worse.
Line 1: Line 1: −
<center>{{cquote|Though I know I should be wary<br>Still I venture someplace scary<br>Ghostly haunting I turn loose<br>Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, '''Beetlejuice'''!}}</center>
+
I came here because I (as a conservative) felt that Wikipedia was slightly biased in favor of Obama. I was hoping that here, I would find a project that tried to be honest, avoiding bias and instead trying to be factual. After all, it was founded because Andy Schlafly was tired of Wikipedia's bias (or so I read).
   −
==Articles created by me==
+
However, this place apparently tries to counter perceived left-wing bias by completely over-the-top right-wing bias. It attempts to smear everything that Andy and his helpers see as "liberal" while blindly praising everything they regard as conservative.
<small>(List ''might'' be incomplete)</small>
  −
*[[Birth certificate]]
  −
*[[Bribe]]
  −
*[[Bumper sticker]]
  −
*[[Cage]]
  −
*[[Cameo]]
  −
*[[Endorsement]]
  −
*[[Forensics]]
  −
*[[Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences]]
  −
*[[Resignation]]
  −
*[[Vote]] (full rewrite of existing article; existing article merged elsewhere)
     −
==Notes to self==
+
At the same time, anybody who doesn't 100% agree with them will be bullied, reverted and subjected to completely arbitrary interpretations of fuzzy rules ("13 out of your last 15 edits have been talk, talk, talk"). Oddly enough, these warnings always come when people make good points.
*[[Wikiproject:News/Wanted page]]
+
 
 +
And if there aren't warnings, there are personal remarks, including calling me a liberal. Apparently, you're only a conservative if you think that Conservative's "articles" are totally okay. If you think they barely qualify as an essay, much less as a real article, you're a liberal.
 +
 
 +
So with the 90/10 warnings, the censorship, the incoherent ranting and vilification of anything classified as "liberal" (including evolution, of course - because all ''real'' conservatives are Young Earth Creationists, I guess) and the personal remarks, I don't see much that is keeping me here.
 +
 
 +
I would like to thank the people here, though. You made me realize that Wikipedia isn't so bad, after all. It's not perfect, but this site proves that it could be a lot worse.
 +
 
 +
I didn't break any commandment, but I guess that this page will be deleted soon enough and that I will be banned for... well... I'm sure somebody will think of something.
150

edits

Navigation menu