6
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 34:
Line 34: +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 21:26, September 13, 2008
, 21:26, September 13, 2008no edit summary
Honest question, is it against the rules to disagree with Andrew Schlafly or criticize that letter? I just want to know so I don't end up in the same situation as other people who have been censored here.--[[User:IanG|IanG]] 17:03, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
Honest question, is it against the rules to disagree with Andrew Schlafly or criticize that letter? I just want to know so I don't end up in the same situation as other people who have been censored here.--[[User:IanG|IanG]] 17:03, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
:I believe this this page is only for discussion of the response, which is quite straightforward. Criticism of the letter should have gone on it's talk page, but it's too late now. Oh well. There is no censorship on Conservapedia. Your comment is not substantive - please refactor it. Praise jesus, [[User:Pila|Pila]] 17:26, 13 September 2008 (EDT)