Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎races: Not all mutations are destructive.
Line 97: Line 97:  
- on a side note last I heard "race" is not a very scientific term, as no given gene or combination of genes can define a race.As in there is not a single trait you can define a race by. Ex. not ALL negroid people have very dark skin, some actually very light (I'm trying really hard not to sound racist here. We can all agree any discussion of race is a touchy subject, best avoided...And thankfully science says races probabaly don't even exist)
 
- on a side note last I heard "race" is not a very scientific term, as no given gene or combination of genes can define a race.As in there is not a single trait you can define a race by. Ex. not ALL negroid people have very dark skin, some actually very light (I'm trying really hard not to sound racist here. We can all agree any discussion of race is a touchy subject, best avoided...And thankfully science says races probabaly don't even exist)
 
-Damien Rivers
 
-Damien Rivers
 +
 +
: Not all mutations destroy information.  Many are neutral.  That is, they can change genes to a different form that has no new function.  Further, there may be some genes that are ''designed'' to vary, such as genes that control the production of antibodies.  They wouldn't change so that they do something different than that, but they may change so that they can recognise different infections.
 +
: As far as races are concerned, you are quite correct.  Did you actually read the link?
 +
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 17:58, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
    
==mention other creation theories==
 
==mention other creation theories==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu