Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 154: Line 154:     
:You clearly have. You can read all about it [[triangular trade|here]] without any citations. [[User:Visitor|Visitor]] 21:02, 24 August 2008 (EDT)
 
:You clearly have. You can read all about it [[triangular trade|here]] without any citations. [[User:Visitor|Visitor]] 21:02, 24 August 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
I'm also very puzzled by Aschafly's statement. My very clear impression is that guns and textiles from Europe (especially England) were important in the Triangular Trade. I don't understand why Aschafly objects to this quite well-known fact (I think it's a fact) - what has that to do with being conservative, one way or the other? [[User:KennyMac|KennyMac]] 20:27, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
    
== What about vikings? ==
 
== What about vikings? ==
    
Reading over this lecture, I couldn't find any information on them. They were a successful settlement in the Americas, landing in Greenland and Icelans, which is recognized as part of North America. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 22:45, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
 
Reading over this lecture, I couldn't find any information on them. They were a successful settlement in the Americas, landing in Greenland and Icelans, which is recognized as part of North America. [[User:JohnI|JohnI]] 22:45, 2 September 2008 (EDT)
42

edits

Navigation menu