nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 106:
Line 106: + + + +
Talk:Roman Catholicism (view source)
Revision as of 07:13, September 14, 2008
, 07:13, September 14, 2008→What a waste of time
::I'm going to correct this article once more (this time, I'll add the Herrin reference). If you revert my edits, I'll conclude that facts which conflict with American "conservative" prejudices aren't welcome here. Your choice.[[User:KennyMac|KennyMac]] 17:42, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
::I'm going to correct this article once more (this time, I'll add the Herrin reference). If you revert my edits, I'll conclude that facts which conflict with American "conservative" prejudices aren't welcome here. Your choice.[[User:KennyMac|KennyMac]] 17:42, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
:::What I see is that you are simply reinserting the same information, again without discussion as to individual merit, and basically saying that should be enough and any effort to revert it will look poorly upon me - no. I also have to ask what edits of Philip's in Roman Catholicism or the other articles you have edited led you to your conclusions?
:::I have allowed you to stay because you do have knowledge which I believe could be beneifical, but your approach must improve. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 03:13, 14 September 2008 (EDT)