27
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 8:
Line 8: − +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 14:13, September 14, 2008
, 14:13, September 14, 2008no edit summary
::: Right. The next step is to criticize the taxpayer funding of this junk science. When the authors and the publishing organization will not even address statistical errors in the work, then it's time to pull the public funding.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:13, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
::: Right. The next step is to criticize the taxpayer funding of this junk science. When the authors and the publishing organization will not even address statistical errors in the work, then it's time to pull the public funding.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 10:13, 13 September 2008 (EDT)
::::Toffeeman's comment seemed to me to be substantive in any sense you could name. In what way was it a 'misrepresentation'?
::::Toffeeman's comment seemed to me to be substantive in any sense you could name. In what way was it a 'misrepresentation'? [[User:Sam99foster|Sam99foster]] 10:13, 14 September 2008 (EDT)