nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 296:
Line 296: + +
Talk:Isaac Newton (view source)
Revision as of 09:02, September 17, 2008
, 09:02, September 17, 2008→Reversion explained: On Pfizenmaier
::: I'm happy to reconsider the evidence, but let's not delete evidence while considering it. Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:28, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::: I'm happy to reconsider the evidence, but let's not delete evidence while considering it. Thanks and Godspeed.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 22:28, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::: I note that you (RJJensen) quote Pfizenmaier saying, "Among contemporary scholars, the consensus is that Newton was an Arian". His paper is apparently not available on-line without a subscription, so I can't check it for myself, but I do note that [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/1177/ another source] also cites Pfizenmaier in support of the claim that "Some have accused him of Arianism, but it’s likely he held to the Eastern Orthodox view of the Trinity rather than the Western one held by Roman Catholics, Anglicans and most Protestants.". [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 05:02, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
== new material by RJJensen ==
== new material by RJJensen ==