Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
mLine 185:
Line 185: − − :I hate to say it so bluntly, Andy, but you more than somewhat had this coming. You provided, quite simply, an elementary knowledge of statistics, and an ignorance of a vast collection of general knowledge. I believe it is entirely possible you suffer from [[Creation Syndrome]] [[User:IssacP|IssacP]] 10:24, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 14:29, September 17, 2008
, 14:29, September 17, 2008Reverted edits by IssacP (Talk); changed back to last version by Aschlafly
The anonymity of the response is standard procedure in scientific publishing and necessary to ensure objectivity of the evaluation process, and should not be construed negatively as has been done here.
The anonymity of the response is standard procedure in scientific publishing and necessary to ensure objectivity of the evaluation process, and should not be construed negatively as has been done here.