560
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 18:
Line 18: + + + Line 51:
Line 54: +
Talk:Bipolar disorder (view source)
Revision as of 15:13, September 17, 2008
, 15:13, September 17, 2008no edit summary
:::Yup, my thoughts exactly. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:37, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
:::Yup, my thoughts exactly. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 23:37, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::::Which paragraph are you talking about? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:06, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::::Which paragraph are you talking about? [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 00:06, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::"However, this conventional wisdom ignores pressing evidence for environmental conditioning, including the high correlation of BPD and other psychiatric conditions with upbringing in socialist or liberal nations, and the high correlation of increased mental disorder with education in public/state schools."
:::::[[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 11:13, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
== Moved from [[User talk: HelpJazz]] ==
== Moved from [[User talk: HelpJazz]] ==
Notice the subtleties of the words I have highlighted. This text is expressing the widely held consensus of the medical community, and some noticeable trends regarding bipolar disorder, ''not'' a fixed set of unsubstantiated facts as Bugler implies. Compare this to the statement that "this conventional wisdom ignores pressing evidence for environmental conditioning", etc. etc. when in fact no such evidence has been provided or is likely to be provided. Who is actually advancing their theories as if they are facts? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 20:27, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
Notice the subtleties of the words I have highlighted. This text is expressing the widely held consensus of the medical community, and some noticeable trends regarding bipolar disorder, ''not'' a fixed set of unsubstantiated facts as Bugler implies. Compare this to the statement that "this conventional wisdom ignores pressing evidence for environmental conditioning", etc. etc. when in fact no such evidence has been provided or is likely to be provided. Who is actually advancing their theories as if they are facts? [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 20:27, 16 September 2008 (EDT)
::Sideways, see [[Big Science]]. I hope that this will be the piece of grit around which the pearl of Conservapedian opinion will form. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:07, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
::Sideways, see [[Big Science]]. I hope that this will be the piece of grit around which the pearl of Conservapedian opinion will form. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 07:07, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
:::Well it certainly is a piece of grit; you're right about that. [[User:Sideways|Sideways]] 11:13, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
==Medication==
==Medication==