Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
460 bytes added ,  00:47, September 18, 2008
Improved
Line 11: Line 11:  
Disagreement seems to exist however about the exact origins of the term.  In January 2008, a Boston Globe article referred to the "Bush Doctrine" being born on Sept 20th, 2001, when President Bush uttered the words "You are either with us, or against us".<ref>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/16/death_of_the_bush_doctrine/</ref>
 
Disagreement seems to exist however about the exact origins of the term.  In January 2008, a Boston Globe article referred to the "Bush Doctrine" being born on Sept 20th, 2001, when President Bush uttered the words "You are either with us, or against us".<ref>http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2008/01/16/death_of_the_bush_doctrine/</ref>
   −
==VP nominee Sara Palin unaware of the term in 2008==
+
==VP nominee Sara Palin asked about the Bush Doctrine in Charlie Gibson interview==
   −
In a Sept. 11th 2008 ABC television interview with Charlie Gibson, Republican Vice-Presidential nominee [[Sarah Palin]] seemed unaware of the term when she was asked, "Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine."  Governor Palin responded, "In what respect, Charlie?" Charlie Gibson answered, "well, what do you interpret it to be?"   Palin explained that she agreed with Bush's attempts to combat Islamic extremists and terrorism, and admitted that some mistakes had been made.  Gibson then elaborated what he meant by the Bush Doctrine, saying "The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense.  We have the right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us."<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z75QSExE0jU</ref>
+
In a Sept. 11th 2008 ABC television interview with Vice Presidential candidate [[Sarah Palin]], Charlie Gibson asked, "Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine."  Governor Palin responded, "In what respect, Charlie?" Instead of answering her directly, he asked another question, "Well, what do you interpret it to be?" Palin explained that she agreed with Bush's attempts to combat Islamic extremists and terrorism, and admitted that some mistakes had been made.  Gibson then elaborated what he meant by the Bush Doctrine, saying "The Bush Doctrine, as I understand it, is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense.  We have the right to a preemptive strike against any country that we think is going to attack us."<ref>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z75QSExE0jU</ref>
 +
 
 +
What Gibson did not point out, is that he himself once gave a definition of the 'Bush doctrine' (a term without a clear definition) that was similar to Palin's answer. Indeed it has been pointed out since that there are actually four different versions of what the Bush doctrine is and the term and meaning changes over time and place.<ref>http://elections.foxnews.com/2008/09/12/palins-definition-of-bush-doctrine-hits-the-gibson-mark/</ref>
    
==References==
 
==References==
 
<references/>
 
<references/>
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu