Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
→‎races: Specificity; duplication is not creation; speciation occurs; definition of evolution
Line 129: Line 129:  
As for where the first genetic information ever came from.. that is origins of life not evolution, and though there are theories, this is much less experimentally sound science at the moment.( not to mention a whole other discussion)
 
As for where the first genetic information ever came from.. that is origins of life not evolution, and though there are theories, this is much less experimentally sound science at the moment.( not to mention a whole other discussion)
 
-Damien
 
-Damien
 +
 +
: Whether or not an old protein can take on a new function depends on whether or not that new function is more or less specific.  See [http://creationontheweb.com/content/view/2107/ A-I Milano mutation—evidence for evolution?] for an example that I think addresses the sort of situation you are describing.
 +
: Gene duplication is not the creation of ''new'' information, but the duplication of ''existing'' information.  Whether or not mutations to the duplicate gene count as new information is a separate question.
 +
: Creationists accept that new species can arise.  What they dispute is that such involves new information.
 +
: Whether or not the origin of life is evolution depends on your [[definition of evolution]].
 +
: [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 23:16, 17 September 2008 (EDT)
    
==mention other creation theories==
 
==mention other creation theories==
nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254

edits

Navigation menu