42
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 12:45, September 18, 2008
, 12:45, September 18, 2008Content box to top of page
Notice: misrepresentations are not going to be allowed on this page. Substantive comments only, please.
Notice: misrepresentations are not going to be allowed on this page. Substantive comments only, please.
==Initial discussion ==
In this day and age, scientists have their own agenda and have corrupted science. Just look at global warming or cloning or stem cells as proof. With that said, the only way to get the real truth is by suing in court. Unfortunately, scientists are bound to vast wealth and have the power to defend themselves vigorously. If ever a fund was set up to pay for a suit, I would contribute. It is a classic case whereby the truth be known, the truth will prevail. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:14, 12 September 2008 (EDT)
In this day and age, scientists have their own agenda and have corrupted science. Just look at global warming or cloning or stem cells as proof. With that said, the only way to get the real truth is by suing in court. Unfortunately, scientists are bound to vast wealth and have the power to defend themselves vigorously. If ever a fund was set up to pay for a suit, I would contribute. It is a classic case whereby the truth be known, the truth will prevail. -- [[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 22:14, 12 September 2008 (EDT)