Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
20,682
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 1:
Line 1: + +
Talk:Comprehension gap (view source)
Revision as of 19:27, September 18, 2008
, 19:27, September 18, 2008reply
Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:07, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
Is the abortion example really necessary? It's somewhat convoluted and comes off more as another venue to speak against abortion than as a clear example of a comprehension gap. [[User:HelpJazz|Help]][[User talk:HelpJazz|Jazz]] 14:07, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
If it doesn't fit well, replace with a better example. Personally, I thought the use in the sentence was weaker. You removed the disclaimer and the category, fine.--[[Image:50 star flag.png|14px]] [[User:Jpatt|jp]] 15:27, 18 September 2008 (EDT)