4
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 311:
Line 311: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 14:20, September 19, 2008
, 14:20, September 19, 2008→Dear Aschlafly,
:::Are you not making an assumption here, JohnDee? If you were in his position, would you have answered a letter with all these mistakes and a condescending tone?--[[User:Carolyn|Carolyn]] 09:54, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
:::Are you not making an assumption here, JohnDee? If you were in his position, would you have answered a letter with all these mistakes and a condescending tone?--[[User:Carolyn|Carolyn]] 09:54, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
::::Read over this talk page. Andy has never directly answered any criticism of his PNAS letter. He either removes the comment from the talk page, bans the user, or just refuses to answer the question. Sometimes all three. Given this and the criticism I've seen on this page from people who seem to know what they are talking about, the only conclusion I can come to is Andy doesn't actually understand why z-transformations are applied, what a Monte Carlo re-sampling test is, etc. If understood any of this, I would assume he would actually answer their questions. [[User:JohnDee|JohnDee]] 10:20, 19 September 2008 (EDT)