9
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 275:
Line 275: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 14:30, September 19, 2008
, 14:30, September 19, 2008→Data from several experiments
It is with great sadness that I note that the author of this - the only significant statistical explanation and discussion in this entire fiasco- has [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=DeanS&page=User%3AKennyMac just been blocked] for five years. Even his email is blocked, so he can't even appeal the action. I don't see such manouvers as having contributed to the much vaunted "open mind" of which various people here speak. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 10:27, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
It is with great sadness that I note that the author of this - the only significant statistical explanation and discussion in this entire fiasco- has [http://www.conservapedia.com/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=DeanS&page=User%3AKennyMac just been blocked] for five years. Even his email is blocked, so he can't even appeal the action. I don't see such manouvers as having contributed to the much vaunted "open mind" of which various people here speak. [[User:BenHur|BenHur]] 10:27, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
:It seems to me this talk page is basically a trap. The bait has been set: "substantive comments welcome!" but anyone who enters is pegged as vandal and banned. Well, it's been nice editing here. [[User:TomG|TomG]] 10:30, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
== Dear Aschlafly, ==
== Dear Aschlafly, ==