3,303
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Talk:Punctuation mark (view source)
Revision as of 22:15, September 19, 2008
, 22:15, September 19, 2008New page: ==Diacriticals/circumflex== I think your removal of these is a mistake. Knowledge of these is useful to a well-rounded education, such as we are trying to convey to our readers and studemt...
==Diacriticals/circumflex==
I think your removal of these is a mistake. Knowledge of these is useful to a well-rounded education, such as we are trying to convey to our readers and studemts; and although they are not used in English (and indeed the French are cravenly getting rid of the cedilla, etc), we need to stand up for standards in foreign languages as well as our own. Besides, they are useful equipment for men and women of the world, who wish to carry off a certain ''je ne sais quoi'', the hallmark of a Conservapedian. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:15, 19 September 2008 (EDT)
I think your removal of these is a mistake. Knowledge of these is useful to a well-rounded education, such as we are trying to convey to our readers and studemts; and although they are not used in English (and indeed the French are cravenly getting rid of the cedilla, etc), we need to stand up for standards in foreign languages as well as our own. Besides, they are useful equipment for men and women of the world, who wish to carry off a certain ''je ne sais quoi'', the hallmark of a Conservapedian. [[User:Bugler|Bugler]] 18:15, 19 September 2008 (EDT)