Changes

There were claims that the paper had bypassed the peer review process, but these were shown to be false.<ref>McVay, 2005</ref>

There were claims that the paper had bypassed the peer review process, but these were shown to be false.<ref>McVay, 2005</ref>

The refusal to ever publish on the topic again was not on the grounds of not passing peer review, but in line with the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]'s position that Intelligent Design is not science.<ref>Sternberg</ref><ref>[http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington]</ref><ref>Walker, 2007</ref><ref>Klinghoffer, 1995a</ref>

The refusal to ever publish on the topic again was not on the grounds of not passing peer review, but in line with the [[American Association for the Advancement of Science]]'s position that Intelligent Design is not science.<ref>Sternberg; Walker, 2007; Klinghoffer, 1995a</ref><ref>[http://www.biolsocwash.org/id_statement.html Statement from the Council of the Biological Society of Washington]</ref>

==== ''Science'' letters to the editor ====

==== ''Science'' letters to the editor ====