Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 127:
Line 127: + + + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 21:54, September 20, 2008
, 21:54, September 20, 2008→Point 5 Confirmed: reply
--[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 17:13, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
--[[User:Toffeeman|Toffeeman]] 17:13, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
::: The falsehood consists of pretending to apply the Whitlock Z-transform in a straightforward, logical and correct manner. I think the Lenski paper is intentionally misleading by using the "whether or not" wording, when both alternatives are nonsensical. Point 5 has been proven above to be correct in identify an error in the Lenski paper.
::: "Toffeeman", your blocking history suggests you have been less than straightforward yourself. Go elsewhere if you seek to be deceitful. You're not fooling anyone here.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 17:54, 20 September 2008 (EDT)
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>