Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
764 bytes added ,  20:03, March 20, 2007
Line 177: Line 177:     
::The quote was in the article, it was attributed to a judge in the article, I expanded that attribution for the article, but you want a specific reference for it we can cite a copy of the hearing. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 15:31, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 
::The quote was in the article, it was attributed to a judge in the article, I expanded that attribution for the article, but you want a specific reference for it we can cite a copy of the hearing. [[User:Tmtoulouse|Tmtoulouse]] 15:31, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
::: Where in the article was the quote?  I looked through the whole article.  Besides, it would be nice to direct our readers to "page 2" or "page 11".  I couldn't find the quote, nor any mention of an English Justice, nor of the English Court system.  Yes, I understand you have presented additional references.  But the thing is, we are trying to present a good clean article, okay?  Where is the quote in the ''Time''  article ?  I mean, your approach seems to be something like, "here is some dis and here are references to dis, sort it out for yourself. This is completely unacceptable and directly defies Commandment #1, I'm sure you understand where I'm coming from.  Where, specifically, is the quote ? [[User:Terryeo|Terryeo]] 16:03, 20 March 2007 (EDT)
343

edits

Navigation menu