122
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 139:
Line 139: + +
Talk:PNAS Response to Letter (view source)
Revision as of 16:03, September 21, 2008
, 16:03, September 21, 2008→Point 5 Confirmed
::::: The quality and reliability of data is proportional to sample size, and when different studies are combined they need to be weighted accordingly. The results from a very large sample size would not be weighted equally with the results from a small sample size, as you and Lenski have done. That's basic logic, though I'm not optimistic that you or Lenski will admit it. Open-minded people who respect logic have no difficulty elevating logic over personal whim.-[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:30, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
::::: The quality and reliability of data is proportional to sample size, and when different studies are combined they need to be weighted accordingly. The results from a very large sample size would not be weighted equally with the results from a small sample size, as you and Lenski have done. That's basic logic, though I'm not optimistic that you or Lenski will admit it. Open-minded people who respect logic have no difficulty elevating logic over personal whim.-[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 11:30, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
:::::: So, what is the p-value you find when performing the calculations according to your way? --[[User:Stitch75|Stitch75]] 12:03, 21 September 2008 (EDT)
== References ==
== References ==
<references/>
<references/>