Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
555 bytes added ,  17:09, September 22, 2008
Line 248: Line 248:  
:Palin asked the probe to acknowledge a rule of law before they began, and they refused.  We all know what is going to happen from a legal standpoint - nothing.  She is well within her right to do what she did.  The question is how much innuendo outside of legal issues will be presented to attempt to hurt her.  With the pictures with the Obama campaign and the "October Surprise" comment made by Palin's opposition her concern is certainly understandable.  It has long been acknowledged that Palin has a feud with the entrenched Alaska GOP who are not happy with her exposing their corruption.  That makes your count of Republicans and Democrats meaningless.  When you are someone who exposes corruption in government regardless of party, that can happen. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:11, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
 
:Palin asked the probe to acknowledge a rule of law before they began, and they refused.  We all know what is going to happen from a legal standpoint - nothing.  She is well within her right to do what she did.  The question is how much innuendo outside of legal issues will be presented to attempt to hurt her.  With the pictures with the Obama campaign and the "October Surprise" comment made by Palin's opposition her concern is certainly understandable.  It has long been acknowledged that Palin has a feud with the entrenched Alaska GOP who are not happy with her exposing their corruption.  That makes your count of Republicans and Democrats meaningless.  When you are someone who exposes corruption in government regardless of party, that can happen. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 16:11, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Well, if you're correct in figuring that the inquiry would be a witch hunt at this point because both parties in Alaska have a grudge, then she's got problems, all right.  If she goes ahead it could get ugly, and if she tries to kill, delay or withhold info from it then she loses a lot of the reformer/maverick image she's cultivated.  It'll be an interesting couple of months between now and the election, that's for sure.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:47, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
 
::Well, if you're correct in figuring that the inquiry would be a witch hunt at this point because both parties in Alaska have a grudge, then she's got problems, all right.  If she goes ahead it could get ugly, and if she tries to kill, delay or withhold info from it then she loses a lot of the reformer/maverick image she's cultivated.  It'll be an interesting couple of months between now and the election, that's for sure.  --[[User:DinsdaleP|DinsdaleP]] 16:47, 18 September 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Suspect sentence ==
 +
 +
This was added to the last paragraph of the Personal Background section before the page was protected:
 +
 +
"After given the choice, Bristol bravely chose to keep the child."
 +
 +
This does not match what Gov. Palin has said about Bristol's pregnancy.  In fact, it seems to be a subtle attempt to falsely introduce the idea that abortion was considered.  This seems even more likely considering that the editor who put the sentence in was just caught posting false information. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 13:09, 22 September 2008 (EDT)
Block
1,976

edits

Navigation menu